[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4BBF9B34.5040909@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 09 Apr 2010 17:25:08 -0400
From: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@...el.com>,
"Wu, Fengguang" <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH]vmscan: handle underflow for get_scan_ratio
On 04/09/2010 05:20 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Come to that, it's not obvious that we need this in 2.6.34 either. What
> is the user-visible impact here?
I suspect very little impact, especially during workloads
where we can just reclaim clean page cache at DEF_PRIORITY.
FWIW, the patch looks good to me, so:
Acked-by: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists