linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 04/16] viafb: Retain GEMODE reserved bits

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4BBE99F6.9060300@gmx.de>
Date:	Fri, 09 Apr 2010 05:07:34 +0200
From:	Florian Tobias Schandinat <FlorianSchandinat@....de>
To:	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Harald Welte <laforge@...monks.org>,
	JosephChan@....com.tw, ScottFang@...tech.com.cn,
	Deepak Saxena <dsaxena@...top.org>,
	linux-fbdev-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/16] viafb: Retain GEMODE reserved bits

Hi Jon,

Jonathan Corbet schrieb:
> Commit c3e25673843153ea75fda79a47cf12f10a25ca37 (viafb: 2D engine rewrite)
> changed the setting of the GEMODE register so that the reserved bits are no
> longer preserved.  Fix that; at the same time, move this code to its own
> function and restore the use of symbolic constants.

in your later patch "[PATCH 06/16] viafb: complete support for 
VX800/VX855 accelerated framebuffer" you reintroduce initializing those 
bits to 0. That's fine but I can't see a reason for preserving this bits 
here as it adds useless overhead unless the hardware itself changed some 
of those bits and behaves differently according to those bits. 
Additionally the first 2 bits are not reserved but provide a rotation 
where 00 is what we want (no rotation).
And if you rip code off hw_bitblt_2 it would be better to do the same 
with hw_bitblt_1. A quick look reveals that the same function can be 
used there (the error message would need to be adjusted but that's minor).
So nack@...serving (unless it would cause problems otherwise) but 
ack@...ping code off and sharing between hw_bitblt_1 & hw_bitblt_2.


Thanks,

Florian Tobias Schandinat

> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
> ---
>  drivers/video/via/accel.c |   48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
>  1 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/video/via/accel.c b/drivers/video/via/accel.c
> index d5077df..78c0a2b 100644
> --- a/drivers/video/via/accel.c
> +++ b/drivers/video/via/accel.c
> @@ -165,12 +165,41 @@ static int hw_bitblt_1(void __iomem *engine, u8 op, u32 width, u32 height,
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +/*
> + * Figure out an appropriate bytes-per-pixel setting.
> + */
> +static int viafb_set_bpp(void __iomem *engine, u8 bpp)
> +{
> +	u32 gemode;
> +
> +	/* Preserve the reserved bits */
> +	gemode = readl(engine + VIA_REG_GEMODE) & 0xfffffcff;
> +	switch (bpp) {
> +	case 8:
> +		gemode |= VIA_GEM_8bpp;
> +		break;
> +	case 16:
> +		gemode |= VIA_GEM_16bpp;
> +		break;
> +	case 32:
> +		gemode |= VIA_GEM_32bpp;
> +		break;
> +	default:
> +		printk(KERN_WARNING "hw_bitblt_2: Unsupported bpp %d\n", bpp);
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}
> +	writel(gemode, engine + VIA_REG_GEMODE);
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +
>  static int hw_bitblt_2(void __iomem *engine, u8 op, u32 width, u32 height,
>  	u8 dst_bpp, u32 dst_addr, u32 dst_pitch, u32 dst_x, u32 dst_y,
>  	u32 *src_mem, u32 src_addr, u32 src_pitch, u32 src_x, u32 src_y,
>  	u32 fg_color, u32 bg_color, u8 fill_rop)
>  {
>  	u32 ge_cmd = 0, tmp, i;
> +	int ret;
>  
>  	if (!op || op > 3) {
>  		printk(KERN_WARNING "hw_bitblt_2: Invalid operation: %d\n", op);
> @@ -204,22 +233,9 @@ static int hw_bitblt_2(void __iomem *engine, u8 op, u32 width, u32 height,
>  		}
>  	}
>  
> -	switch (dst_bpp) {
> -	case 8:
> -		tmp = 0x00000000;
> -		break;
> -	case 16:
> -		tmp = 0x00000100;
> -		break;
> -	case 32:
> -		tmp = 0x00000300;
> -		break;
> -	default:
> -		printk(KERN_WARNING "hw_bitblt_2: Unsupported bpp %d\n",
> -			dst_bpp);
> -		return -EINVAL;
> -	}
> -	writel(tmp, engine + 0x04);
> +	ret = viafb_set_bpp(engine, dst_bpp);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
>  
>  	if (op == VIA_BITBLT_FILL)
>  		tmp = 0;

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/