[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100409033532.GI5683@laptop>
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2010 13:35:32 +1000
From: Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Hugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@...cali.co.uk>,
Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/13] mm, powerpc: Move the RCU page-table freeing
into generic code
On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 09:17:46PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Index: linux-2.6/include/asm-generic/tlb.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/include/asm-generic/tlb.h
> +++ linux-2.6/include/asm-generic/tlb.h
> @@ -27,6 +27,49 @@
> #define tlb_fast_mode(tlb) 1
> #endif
>
> +#ifdef HAVE_ARCH_RCU_TABLE_FREE
> +/*
> + * Semi RCU freeing of the page directories.
> + *
> + * This is needed by some architectures to implement gup_fast().
Really? I see the comment in the powerpc code, but powerpc was already
using RCU before gup_fast(), and AFAIKS it is indeed using it so that
it can handle faults by getting the linux pte with find_linux_pte ?
I would have thought this should be a well used method for handling
software TLB faults.
But anyway this looks like a nice abstraction.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists