[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1004101123540.3558@i5.linux-foundation.org>
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2010 11:26:58 -0700 (PDT)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@...com>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@...cali.co.uk>,
sgunderson@...foot.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v2] rmap: make anon_vma_prepare link in all the anon_vmas
of a mergeable VMA
On Sat, 10 Apr 2010, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> I dunno. Does the above sound at all sane? Or am I just raving?
>
> Something hacky like the above might fix it if I'm not just raving. I
> really might be missing something here.
Btw, if this turns out to be accurate, the real fix is to probably just
have a separate phase at the very end to actually release all the vma's,
rather than do it in "free_page_tables()". We don't want to make the
tlb-gather any more atomic than it already is. In fact, Nick is trying to
make it preemptible.
So the patch included in that mail was meant very much as a "let's test my
crazy theory" patch, rather than as the real solution.
The patch is also untested. Maybe it doesn't work at all and introduces
new bugs. Caveat emptor.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists