linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 08/16] viafb: Do not probe for LVDS/TMDS on OLPC XO-1.5

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20100409185501.3164fb90@bike.lwn.net>
Date:	Fri, 9 Apr 2010 18:55:01 -0600
From:	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To:	Florian Tobias Schandinat <FlorianSchandinat@....de>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Harald Welte <laforge@...monks.org>,
	JosephChan@....com.tw, ScottFang@...tech.com.cn,
	Deepak Saxena <dsaxena@...top.org>,
	linux-fbdev-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/16] viafb: Do not probe for LVDS/TMDS on OLPC XO-1.5

On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 02:42:52 +0200
Florian Tobias Schandinat <FlorianSchandinat@....de> wrote:

> > That said, machine_is_olpc() is properly defined for all
> > configurations, so the #ifdefs can (and should) come out.  
> 
> I'm not sure I get you right here. If you talk about removing the 
> defines and only letting the machine check that is something that I 
> would accept now. 

Yes, that is what I mean; the ifdefs don't need to be there.  Had I
thought that through I would have removed them before posting the patch.

jon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/