[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9905.1270887379@redhat.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2010 09:16:19 +0100
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm 3/3] proc: make task_sig() lockless
Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com> wrote:
> I'm not so sure. Operations like sigprocmask and sigaction really have
> always been entirely atomic from the userland perspective before. Now it
> becomes possible to read from /proc e.g. a blocked set that never existed
> as such (one word updated by sigprocmask but not yet the next word).
If you have a small userspace buffer, that was previously possible too.
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists