[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1004100821340.3558@i5.linux-foundation.org>
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2010 08:24:02 -0700 (PDT)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@...com>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@...cali.co.uk>,
sgunderson@...foot.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v2] rmap: make anon_vma_prepare link in all the anon_vmas
of a mergeable VMA
On Sat, 10 Apr 2010, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> >
> > I will keep running that kernel in the next couple of days and keep you
> > informed in case this is the fix we're gonna use.
>
> Yep, you jinxed it :)
>
> This time we got stuck on the anon_vma->lock (yep, we've seen that
> oopsie before). So, it might be that we _really_ are staring at the
> wrong code... Back to square one.
No, I think we're good. I suspect this is a different issue. Do you have
lockdep enabled, along with mutex and spinlock debugging etc? That might
help pinpoint what triggers this.
But I think the fact that you are apparently not able to get the list
corruption is a good sign. Of course, it might just be harder to trigger,
and these things could all be a sign of a different bug, but my gut feel
is that we did fix something, and you are just damn good at stressing the
new code. Kudos.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists