[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100410163529.GI5204@nowhere>
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2010 18:35:30 +0200
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To: Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] random: Forbid llseek on random chardev
On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 11:25:50AM -0500, Matt Mackall wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-04-10 at 16:17 +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> >
> > Seeking on /dev/random and /dev/urandom is pointless.
>
> It is indeed pointless, though that doesn't mean no one does it.
> Forbidding a no-op seems a rather unfriendly way to fix this.
I worried about that too. If you think that could break some user
space apps, we can make it a generic_file_llseek.
> > Using generic_file_llseek means we no longer need to
> > take the BKL if anyone tries to seek on these.
>
> Comment doesn't match the patch?
Oops. I guess the patch has been updated, but not the changelog.
Some background: we are trying to remove the uses of default_llseek
that use the bkl. We started with turning llseek stubs to
generic_file_llseek (or non seekable open in some cases), but we are
hesitating now and think about actually turn all the stubs that
might need the bkl into default_llseek, and fallback to
generic_file_llseek for all other stubs.
Depending on what we do I'll resend you an updated version
of this patch with generic_file_llseek, or I will let the stub
as is.
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists