[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100411100902.GA20141@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2010 18:09:02 +0800
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: yinghai@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: ssh server etc doesn't work anymore with net-2.6
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
> From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
> Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2010 02:32:33 -0700
>
>> server side: 82576 with net-2.6
>> client side: opensuse 11.2 on thinkpad T61 wireless + vpnc
>
> I've pushed out a revert, we'll sort this out in net-next-2.6
> and meanwhile I've started a dialog with the Intel driver
> folks to see if there IGB chip has a problem with handling
> CHECKSUM_PARTIAL packets with a zero length data area.
>
> Thanks for your report.
I was confused at first as to whether it was CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY
that broke or CHECKSUM_PARTIAL.
After looking at the actual net-2.6 tree I see that it is actually
CHECKSUM_PARTIAL that caused this breakage.
The fact that when this was first implemented we didn't use hw
checksums on dataless packets might not have been an oversight
after all.
As I don't think such packets have been tested all by our kernel
on any NICs, and given the fact that IGB apparently broke, I think
the risk of this change is too high.
However, all is not lost as we can still adopt the approach of
the actual patch subject :) That is, we can use CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY
for packets checksummed locally by software.
This does need a lot more testing so it should spend some time
in net-next first.
Cheers,
--
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists