lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1004111707360.3514@i5.linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Sun, 11 Apr 2010 17:13:26 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
cc:	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@...com>,
	Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
	Hugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@...cali.co.uk>,
	sgunderson@...foot.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v2] rmap: make anon_vma_prepare link in all the anon_vmas
 of a mergeable VMA



On Sun, 11 Apr 2010, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> 
> > Conversely, if you still see the oops (rather than the watchdog), that 
> > means that we actually have pages that are still marked mapped, and that 
> > despite that mapped state have a stale page->mapping pointer. I actually 
> > find that the more likely case, because otherwise the window is _so_ small 
> > that I don't see how you can hit the oops so reliably.
> 
> Ok, did test with the all 5 patches applied. It oopsed with the same
> trace, see below. Except one kernel/sched.c:3555 warning checking
> spinlock count overflowing, nothing else. :(

Ok, that preempt-count thing is a real problem, but should be unrelated to 
your issues.

Anyway, so this all means that we definitely have lost sight of an 
'anon_vma', even if page->mapping still points to it, and even though the 
page is still mapped.

I'll see if I can come up with a patch to do the same kind of validation 
on page->mapping as on the anon-vma chains themselves.

> I tried to see whether the page->mapping pointer is stale, I dunno,
> maybe there could be something in the register dump which could tell us
> what's happening.

Sadly, you cannot tell by the pointer. A stale pointer still is a 
perfectly fine kernel pointer, it's just that we've long since released 
the anon_vma it used to point to, and now it points to some random other 
data structure.

> So, it really looks like at least that list_head in anon_vma is
> bollocks, or even the whole anon_vma. So if this is correct, it is
> highly likely that the anon_vma is already freed material or not
> initialized at all.

Yes, it's pretty certain it is long free'd, and re-allocated to something 
else.

		Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ