[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1004111707360.3514@i5.linux-foundation.org>
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2010 17:13:26 -0700 (PDT)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@...com>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@...cali.co.uk>,
sgunderson@...foot.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v2] rmap: make anon_vma_prepare link in all the anon_vmas
of a mergeable VMA
On Sun, 11 Apr 2010, Borislav Petkov wrote:
>
> > Conversely, if you still see the oops (rather than the watchdog), that
> > means that we actually have pages that are still marked mapped, and that
> > despite that mapped state have a stale page->mapping pointer. I actually
> > find that the more likely case, because otherwise the window is _so_ small
> > that I don't see how you can hit the oops so reliably.
>
> Ok, did test with the all 5 patches applied. It oopsed with the same
> trace, see below. Except one kernel/sched.c:3555 warning checking
> spinlock count overflowing, nothing else. :(
Ok, that preempt-count thing is a real problem, but should be unrelated to
your issues.
Anyway, so this all means that we definitely have lost sight of an
'anon_vma', even if page->mapping still points to it, and even though the
page is still mapped.
I'll see if I can come up with a patch to do the same kind of validation
on page->mapping as on the anon-vma chains themselves.
> I tried to see whether the page->mapping pointer is stale, I dunno,
> maybe there could be something in the register dump which could tell us
> what's happening.
Sadly, you cannot tell by the pointer. A stale pointer still is a
perfectly fine kernel pointer, it's just that we've long since released
the anon_vma it used to point to, and now it points to some random other
data structure.
> So, it really looks like at least that list_head in anon_vma is
> bollocks, or even the whole anon_vma. So if this is correct, it is
> highly likely that the anon_vma is already freed material or not
> initialized at all.
Yes, it's pretty certain it is long free'd, and re-allocated to something
else.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists