[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100412185607.10c7b3be@neptune.home>
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 18:56:07 +0200
From: Bruno Prémont <bonbons@...ux-vserver.org>
To: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
Cc: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Rick L. Vinyard Jr." <rvinyard@...nmsu.edu>,
Nicu Pavel <npavel@...ner.com>,
Oliver Neukum <oliver@...kum.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 7/8, needs improvement] hid: add suspend/resume hooks
for hid drivers
On Mon, 12 April 2010 Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz> wrote:
> On Sun, 11 Apr 2010, Bruno Prémont wrote:
>
> > > > As far as I understand the code, in auto-suspend case if the driver
> > > > sends commands to the device it will have to call usbhid_wait_io().
> > > > Please correct me if I'm wrong!
> > >
> > > It's not needed. There is a queuing mechanism in place on
> > > 'resumption_waker' workqueue.
> >
> > So the driver is not allowed to ask the device to do something
> > at auto-suspend time (as that would abort the auto-suspension).
>
> What do you mean by "is not allowed" exactly?
>
> Yes, it will wake the device up from auto-suspension. However, that's
> usually what you want to happen, is there is anything you need to dispatch
> to the device, isn't it?
I thought of a report to send to device to ask the device to disable some
power using feature (e.g. turning off or dimming LEDs)
> What exactly is the situation you are trying to handle?
That's rather a generic question, not related to any implementation.
Maybe I'm mixing suspend and USB-autosuspend too much?
Thanks,
Bruno
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists