[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100412190002.GA8595@a1.tnic>
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 21:00:02 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@...com>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@...cali.co.uk>,
sgunderson@...foot.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v2] rmap: make anon_vma_prepare link in all the
anon_vmas of a mergeable VMA
From: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Date: Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 02:40:22PM -0400
> On 04/12/2010 12:26 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> >But there is a _much_ more subtle case that involved swapping.
> >
> >So guys, here's my fairly simple theory on what happens:
>
> That bug looks entirely possible. Given that Borislav
> has heavy swapping going on, it is quite possible that
> this is the bug he has been triggering.
Yeah, about that. I dunno whether you guys saw that but the machine has
8Gb of RAM and shouldn't be swapping, AFAIK. The largest mem usage I
saw was 5Gb used, most of which pagecache. So I was kinda doubtful when
Linus came up with the swapping theory earlier. I'll pay attention to
the SwapCached in /proc/meminfo more to see whether we do any swapping.
It could be that there is a small amount which is swapped out for
whatever reason... Maybe that's the bug...
But I'll give the patch a run anyway in an hour or so anyway.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists