[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1271113280-10521-1-git-send-regression-fweisbec@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 01:01:18 +0200
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Mahesh Salgaonkar <mahesh@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"K . Prasad" <prasad@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 0/2] hw-breakpoints allocation constraints updates
Hi,
These patches tend to extend the breakpoint allocation constraints to
be more non-x86 friendly.
It can separate the data and instruction breakpoint space and
handle address ranges or other kind of tricky things that makes
a breakpoint use more than one address register.
There is still one kind of constraint it can't handle, something
I've found on ARMv7 implementation: linking an breakpoint to a
watchpoint. But if this needs arises, I will be glad to add that
support.
Beware, it's only compile-tested for now.
Tell me what you think.
Thanks.
Frederic Weisbecker (2):
hw-breakpoints: Separate constraint space for data and instruction
breakpoints
hw-breakpoints: Handle breakpoint weight in allocation constraints
arch/Kconfig | 11 ++++
arch/x86/Kconfig | 1 +
include/linux/hw_breakpoint.h | 9 ++-
kernel/hw_breakpoint.c | 129 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
4 files changed, 112 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists