linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.34-rc3: simple du (on a big xfs tree) triggers oom killer [bisected: 57817c68229984818fea9e614d6f95249c3fb098]

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 13 Apr 2010 11:42:33 +0200
From:	"Hans-Peter Jansen" <hpj@...la.net>
To:	Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, opensuse-kernel@...nsuse.org,
	xfs@....sgi.com
Subject: Re: 2.6.34-rc3: simple du (on a big xfs tree) triggers oom killer [bisected: 57817c68229984818fea9e614d6f95249c3fb098]

On Tuesday 13 April 2010, 11:18:23 Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 10:50:35AM +0200, Hans-Peter Jansen wrote:
> >
> > Dave, may I ask you kindly for briefly elaborating on the worst
> > consequences of just reverting this hunk, as I've done before?
>
> Well, given that is the new shrinker code generating the warnings,
> reverting/removing that hunk will render the patch useless :0

Excuse me, I didn't express myself well. I'm after the consequences of 
applying the revert, that I posted a few messages above. 

> I'll get you a working 2.6.33 patch tomorrow - it's dinner time
> now....

Cool, thanks. 

Have a nice dinner,
Pete



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/