[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100413102641.4A18.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 10:30:34 +0900 (JST)
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@...el.com>,
"Wu, Fengguang" <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH]vmscan: handle underflow for get_scan_ratio
> On 04/09/2010 05:20 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> > Come to that, it's not obvious that we need this in 2.6.34 either. What
> > is the user-visible impact here?
>
> I suspect very little impact, especially during workloads
> where we can just reclaim clean page cache at DEF_PRIORITY.
> FWIW, the patch looks good to me, so:
>
> Acked-by: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
>
I'm surprised this ack a bit. Rik, do you have any improvement plan about
streaming io detection logic?
I think the patch have a slightly marginal benefit, it help to <1% scan
ratio case. but it have big regression, it cause streaming io (e.g. backup
operation) makes tons swap.
So, I thought we sould do either,
1) drop this one
2) merge to change stream io detection logic improvement at first, and
merge this one at second.
Am i missing something?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists