[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100413155253.GD25756@csn.ul.ie>
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 16:52:53 +0100
From: Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>
To: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Bob Liu <lliubbo@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] change alloc function in alloc_slab_page
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 12:25:00AM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> alloc_slab_page never calls alloc_pages_node with -1.
Are you certain? What about
__kmalloc
-> slab_alloc (passed -1 as a node from __kmalloc)
-> __slab_alloc
-> new_slab
-> allocate_slab
-> alloc_slab_page
> It means node's validity check is unnecessary.
> So we can use alloc_pages_exact_node instead of alloc_pages_node.
> It could avoid comparison and branch as 6484eb3e2a81807722 tried.
>
> Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>
> Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>
> ---
> mm/slub.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
> index b364844..9984165 100644
> --- a/mm/slub.c
> +++ b/mm/slub.c
> @@ -1084,7 +1084,7 @@ static inline struct page *alloc_slab_page(gfp_t flags, int node,
> if (node == -1)
> return alloc_pages(flags, order);
> else
> - return alloc_pages_node(node, flags, order);
> + return alloc_pages_exact_node(node, flags, order);
> }
>
> static struct page *allocate_slab(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t flags, int node)
> --
> 1.7.0.5
>
--
Mel Gorman
Part-time Phd Student Linux Technology Center
University of Limerick IBM Dublin Software Lab
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists