linux-kernel - RE: [Patch 3/3] net: reserve ports for applications using fixed port numbers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 13 Apr 2010 09:32:22 -0700
From:	"Sean Hefty" <sean.hefty@...el.com>
To:	"'Tetsuo Handa'" <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
	<amwang@...hat.com>, <rolandd@...co.com>
Cc:	<opurdila@...acom.com>, <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
	<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <nhorman@...driver.com>,
	<davem@...emloft.net>, <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [Patch 3/3] net: reserve ports for applications using fixed port numbers

>Sean and Roland, is below patch correct?
>inet_is_reserved_local_port() is the new function proposed in this patchset.

It looks correct to me.  I didn't test the patch series, but if I comment out
the call to inet_is_reserved_local_port() in the provided below, the changes
worked fine for me.

Acked-by: Sean Hefty <sean.hefty@...el.com>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/