[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1271181774.4807.1868.camel@twins>
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 20:02:54 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com>
Cc: HÃ¥kon Bugge <Haakon.Bugge@....COM>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Eric B Munson <ebmunson@...ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
rolandd@...co.com, pavel@....cz, mingo@...e.hu, jsquyres@...co.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ummunotify: Userspace support for MMU notifications
On Tue, 2010-04-13 at 10:57 -0700, Roland Dreier wrote:
> Are those system calls the only possible way that virtual to physical
> mappings can change? Can't page migration or something like that
> potentially affect things? And even if you did have hooks into every
> system call that mattered (keep in mind that relying on glibc is not
> enough, since an MPI application may not use glibc) would decoding them
> and figuring out what happened really be preferable to a single event
> type that tells you exactly what address range was affected?
Yeah, virtual<->physical maps can change through swapping, page
migration, memory compaction, huge-page aggregation (the latter two not
yet being upstream).
Even mlock() doesn't pin virtual<->physical maps.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists