[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1271182936.4807.1877.camel@twins>
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 20:22:16 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Raistlin <raistlin@...ux.it>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Chris Friesen <cfriesen@...tel.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Darren Hart <darren@...art.com>,
Henrik Austad <henrik@...tad.us>,
Johan Eker <johan.eker@...csson.com>,
"p.faure" <p.faure@...tech.ch>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Claudio Scordino <claudio@...dence.eu.com>,
michael trimarchi <trimarchi@...is.sssup.it>,
Fabio Checconi <fabio@...dalf.sssup.it>,
Tommaso Cucinotta <t.cucinotta@...up.it>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...il.com>,
Nicola Manica <nicola.manica@...il.com>,
Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@...tn.it>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 02/11] sched: SCHED_DEADLINE policy implementation.
On Sun, 2010-02-28 at 20:17 +0100, Raistlin wrote:
> + /*
> + * Arm the timer to fire at wakeup, tying to compensate for
> + * the fact that wakeup is actually coming from rq->clock and
> + * not from hrtimer's time base reading.
> + */
> + act = ns_to_ktime(wakeup);
> + now = hrtimer_cb_get_time(&dl_se->dl_timer);
> + delta = ktime_to_ns(now) - rq->clock;
> + act = ktime_add_ns(act, delta);
This is sad, but I'm afraid a reality we have to live with..
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists