linux-kernel - [PATCH 05/12] perf, x86: pass enable bit mask to __x86_pmu_enable

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 13 Apr 2010 22:23:14 +0200
From:	Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
CC:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com>
Subject: [PATCH 05/12] perf, x86: pass enable bit mask to __x86_pmu_enable_event()

To reuse this function for events with different enable bit masks,
this mask is part of the function's argument list now.

The function will be used later to control ibs events too.

Signed-off-by: Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c       |    9 +++++----
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c |    5 +++--
 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
index 9eeffad..f66f52a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
@@ -847,10 +847,10 @@ void hw_perf_enable(void)
 	x86_pmu.enable_all(added);
 }
 
-static inline void __x86_pmu_enable_event(struct hw_perf_event *hwc)
+static inline void __x86_pmu_enable_event(struct hw_perf_event *hwc,
+					  u64 enable_mask)
 {
-	wrmsrl(hwc->config_base + hwc->idx,
-			      hwc->config | ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL_ENABLE);
+	wrmsrl(hwc->config_base + hwc->idx, hwc->config | enable_mask);
 }
 
 static inline void x86_pmu_disable_event(struct perf_event *event)
@@ -922,7 +922,8 @@ static void x86_pmu_enable_event(struct perf_event *event)
 {
 	struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = &__get_cpu_var(cpu_hw_events);
 	if (cpuc->enabled)
-		__x86_pmu_enable_event(&event->hw);
+		__x86_pmu_enable_event(&event->hw,
+				       ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL_ENABLE);
 }
 
 /*
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
index a099df9..a4b56ac 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
@@ -513,7 +513,8 @@ static void intel_pmu_nhm_enable_all(int added)
 			if (!event)
 				continue;
 
-			__x86_pmu_enable_event(&event->hw);
+			__x86_pmu_enable_event(&event->hw,
+					       ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL_ENABLE);
 		}
 	}
 	intel_pmu_enable_all(added);
@@ -617,7 +618,7 @@ static void intel_pmu_enable_event(struct perf_event *event)
 	if (unlikely(event->attr.precise))
 		intel_pmu_pebs_enable(event);
 
-	__x86_pmu_enable_event(hwc);
+	__x86_pmu_enable_event(hwc, ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL_ENABLE);
 }
 
 /*
-- 
1.7.0.3


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/