linux-kernel - Re: [REGRESSION 2.6.30][PATCH 1/1] sched: defer idle accounting till after load update period

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20100413133903.9d38a6ee.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Tue, 13 Apr 2010 13:39:03 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:	Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@...onical.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
	kernel-team <kernel-team@...ts.ubuntu.com>
Subject: Re: [REGRESSION 2.6.30][PATCH 1/1] sched: defer idle accounting
 till after load update period

On Thu, 1 Apr 2010 22:01:59 +0200 (CEST)
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:

> On Thu, 1 Apr 2010, Chase Douglas wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 3:27 PM, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> > 
> > Thomas Gleixner seems to think this isn't the best approach (later
> > email in this thread), so I'm deferring sending it unless someone is
> > still interested in this approach.
> 
> Well, it's a good workaround for now I think, I just answered Andrews
> question whether we can't do any better :)
> 

So... should we merge Chase's patch?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/