linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] USB: rename usb_buffer_alloc() and usb_buffer

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20100413214701.GU30801@buzzloop.caiaq.de>
Date:	Tue, 13 Apr 2010 23:47:01 +0200
From:	Daniel Mack <daniel@...aq.de>
To:	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
Cc:	Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Pedro Ribeiro <pedrib@...il.com>,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
	alsa-devel@...a-project.org, Robert Hancock <hancockrwd@...il.com>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] USB: rename usb_buffer_alloc() and usb_buffer_free()

On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 01:26:07PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> I think I will split this up into the following set of patches:
> 	- rename the functions and add a macro for the old names
> 	- rename all in-kernel usages
> 	- rename the staging tree usages
> 	- remove the macros
> 
> the first patch can go in to Linus's tree now, to make it easier for the
> 2nd and 3rd patches to live in linux-next easier as we might need to
> look at the usages in other development trees before we can add the last
> one.
> 
> Sound good?

Yes, thanks a lot.

Daniel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/