[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4BC4F320.8020902@zytor.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 15:41:36 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Yinghai <yinghai.lu@...cle.com>
CC: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@...com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Andy Isaacson <adi@...apodia.org>, guenter.roeck@...csson.com,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Renninger <trenn@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v2 1/2] x86: Reserve [0xa0000, 0x100000] in e820 map
On 04/13/2010 03:29 PM, Yinghai wrote:
>>
>> We have talked about a need to resolve this before.
>
> current code for mmio that is just below 4g, if some PCI BAR use that range, and those range is falling into E820_RESERVED,
>
> those range still can be claimed, but driver can not use pci_request_region() later.
>
> So We still
> 1. rely that BIOS does not reserve the [0xa0000, 0xe0000)
> 2. kernel only reserve the range when we make sure these is legacy device on that range.
>
This really isn't sufficient. There are systems in the field which
marks a memory range reserved in E820 because it a device pointed there,
and it doesn't want that device moved because it is used by an SMM handler.
This was reported quite a while ago (like two years.) I can dig up the
thread if it matters.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists