[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4BC4F9C2.20503@oracle.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 16:09:54 -0700
From: Yinghai <yinghai.lu@...cle.com>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
CC: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@...com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Andy Isaacson <adi@...apodia.org>, guenter.roeck@...csson.com,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Renninger <trenn@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v2 1/2] x86: Reserve [0xa0000, 0x100000] in e820 map
On 04/13/2010 04:07 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 04/13/2010 04:03 PM, Yinghai wrote:
>> On 04/13/2010 04:02 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Are you sure? what is BAR range? greater than 1M ?
>>>>
>>>> e820_reserve_resources() will make that range to be reserved and BUSY in resource tree.
>>>> and if driver for that device want to call pci_request_region, it will get failure...
>>>>
>>>
>>> Yes, > 1 MB in that case, I'm fairly sure.
>>
>> that is ok. actually that is handled by e820_reserve_resource_late(), and it will not put BUSY on the entry at all.
>>
>
> OK... why is that handled differently?
about one year ago, Linus made that change to use insert_resource_expand_to_fit() to honor PCI device BAR than E820_RESERVED.
YH
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists