linux-kernel - linux-next: build failure after merge of the bkl-procfs tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20100413152741.4d56be0c.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:	Tue, 13 Apr 2010 15:27:41 +1000
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	"Frédéric Weisbecker" <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: linux-next: build failure after merge of the bkl-procfs tree

Hi "Frédéric,

After merging the bkl-procfs tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:

net/sunrpc/cache.c: In function 'cache_ioctl_procfs':
net/sunrpc/cache.c:1355: error: implicit declaration of function 'lock_kernel'
net/sunrpc/cache.c:1359: error: implicit declaration of function 'unlock_kernel'

Caused by commit 64ef834551d7696f54553d7608eba80a5a800e77 ("procfs: Push
down the bkl from ioctl").  Forgot to include linux/smp_lock.h?  See
Documentation/SubmitChecklist Rule #1.

I have dropped the bkl-procfs tree for today.
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped