[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4BC41994.7030707@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 15:13:24 +0800
From: Cong Wang <amwang@...hat.com>
To: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>
CC: opurdila@...acom.com, eric.dumazet@...il.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, nhorman@...driver.com, davem@...emloft.net,
ebiederm@...ssion.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Patch 3/3] net: reserve ports for applications using fixed port
numbers
Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> Hello.
>
>> --- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/infiniband/core/cma.c
>> +++ linux-2.6/drivers/infiniband/core/cma.c
>> @@ -1980,6 +1980,8 @@ retry:
>> /* FIXME: add proper port randomization per like inet_csk_get_port */
>> do {
>> ret = idr_get_new_above(ps, bind_list, next_port, &port);
>> + if (!ret && inet_is_reserved_local_port(port))
>> + ret = -EAGAIN;
>> } while ((ret == -EAGAIN) && idr_pre_get(ps, GFP_KERNEL));
>>
>> if (ret)
>>
> I think above part is wrong. Below program
...
>
> This result suggests that above loop will continue until idr_pre_get() fails
> due to out of memory if all ports were reserved.
>
> Also, if idr_get_new_above() returned 0, bind_list (which is a kmalloc()ed
> pointer) is already installed into a free slot (see comment on
> idr_get_new_above_int()). Thus, simply calling idr_get_new_above() again will
> install the same pointer into multiple slots. I guess it will malfunction later.
Thanks for testing!
How about:
+ if (!ret && inet_is_reserved_local_port(port))
+ ret = -EBUSY;
? So that it will break the loop and return error.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists