[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <j2p28c262361004131733m98351a5xf994ead1f21289ef@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 09:33:22 +0900
From: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>, Bob Liu <lliubbo@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] change alloc function in __vmalloc_area_node
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 9:22 AM, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
<kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 00:25:02 +0900
> Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com> wrote:
>
>> __vmalloc_area_node never pass -1 to alloc_pages_node.
>> It means node's validity check is unnecessary.
>> So we can use alloc_pages_exact_node instead of alloc_pages_node.
>> It could avoid comparison and branch as 6484eb3e2a81807722 tried.
>>
>> Cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>
>> Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
>
> But, in another thinking,
>
> - if (node < 0)
> - page = alloc_page(gfp_mask);
>
> may be better ;)
I thought it.
but alloc_page is different function with alloc_pages_node in NUMA.
It calls alloc_pages_current.
--
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists