[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100414135048.GE3616@quack.suse.cz>
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 15:50:48 +0200
From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To: Jan Blunck <jblunck@...e.de>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, tytso@....edu,
Linux-Kernel Mailinglist <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] ext2: Preparation to remove BKL (v2)
On Wed 14-04-10 14:38:32, Jan Blunck wrote:
> This is a series of patches in preparation to the removal of the big kernel
> lock from ext2. It consists mostly of cleanup patches to later introduce a
> spinlock to protect some of the superblock's fields against concurrent access.
> With the spinlock in place we don't need to use the big kernel lock anymore.
>
> This series has been part of the BKL removal patches that I have posted in
> November 2009 already. I've addressed the feedback kindly provided by Ogawa-san
> by moving the ext2_write_super() out of ext2_setup_super().
>
> Changes since v1:
> - fix typo when setting MS_RDONLY
> - take s_lock when setting EXT2_FEATURE_COMPAT_EXT_ATTR
> - fold ext2_commit_super() into ext2_sync_super()
> - include BKL removal patch
OK, I've merged all the patches into my for_testing branch. When it
survives some testing, I'll push them to for_next branch to be pushed
for 2.6.35.
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists