| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <4BC5D34F.80304@lumino.de> Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 16:38:07 +0200 From: Michael Schnell <mschnell@...ino.de> To: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, nios2-dev <nios2-dev@...c.et.ntust.edu.tw> Subject: Re: atomic RAM ? On 04/14/2010 02:57 PM, Alan Cox wrote: > The important point is that you don't *have* to use futex to provide the > posix pthread lock primitives if they don't fit your platform. > I don't *have* to use Linux to provide the function the controller is supposed to do for the end-user :). But Linux is a very decent way to make it happen.... -Michael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists