[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1271208801.1555.12.camel@Joe-Laptop.home>
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 18:33:21 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, fweisbec@...il.com
Subject: Re: [REGRESSION PATCH] vsprintf: increase sizeof precision in
printf_spec
On Tue, 2010-04-13 at 21:13 -0400, Eric Paris wrote:
> Patch ef0658f3de484bf9b173639cd47544584e01efa5 changed the precision field
> from and int to an s8. Problem is that we have code which uses a much larger
> precision in the kernel. An example would in the audit code where we have:
>
> vsnprintf(...,..., " msg='%.1024s'", (char *)data);
>
> which causes precision to be too large and end up truncating to nothing.
> Raising the size of the precision fixes the audit system issue. It also does
> not affect the alignment of the struct according to pahole and is still
> approprietely packed.
I don't see how it could be appropriately packed.
This is the structure now:
struct printf_spec {
u16 type;
s16 field_width; /* width of output field */
u8 flags; /* flags to number() */
u8 base;
s8 precision; /* # of digits/chars */
u8 qualifier;
};
Adding another char should make the structure larger than 64 bits.
type isn't currently required to be u16.
It could be u8.
Perhaps this is better.
struct printf_spec {
u8 type;
u8 flags; /* flags to number() */
u8 base;
u8 qualifier;
s16 field_width; /* width of output field */
s16 precision; /* # of digits/chars */
} __attribute__((packed));
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists