[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100414140422.b6054dbc.randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 14:04:22 -0700
From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
To: "Peter M. Petrakis" <peter.petrakis@...onical.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Reset ps/2 port should psmouse_probe fail before
retrying
On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 16:46:29 -0400 Peter M. Petrakis wrote:
> Filed a bug on this too:
>
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15780
>
> This particular laptop will lose it's synaptics touch
> pad on return from suspend state. Reloading the psmouse
> module makes no difference. I came up with the attached
> work around which simply calls psmouse_reset on the
> port should the initial probe fail. This solves the problem
> for me and I've tested this on several laptops.
>
> Initially discovered on Ubuntu 2.6.31 (karmic) and the problem
> continues to exist in lucid 2.6.32. I've filed a bug against
> ubuntu kernel here:
>
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/551234
>
> though the Ubuntu kernel team would really like to get upstream's
> input on the matter before accepting the patch. Please
> let me know what you think. Thanks.
Hi,
Please send patches inline, not as attachments.
Use the full source file path in the patch.
Send the patch to linux-input@...r.kernel.org and cc: the Input
subsystem maintainer.
typo: s/reseting/resetting/
Other than those 4 things, the patch looks OK to me.
Well, we would prefer not to have the
((ret = __psmouse_probe(psmouse)) != 0)
inside the for expression if possible. I.e., make the for(...) simpler.
Please read/review Documentation/SubmittingPatches. Thanks.
---
~Randy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists