linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/4] cfq-iosched: Keep track of average think time for the sync-noidle workload.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 14 Apr 2010 19:06:38 -0400
From:	Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>
To:	Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
Cc:	jens.axboe@...cle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] cfq-iosched: Keep track of average think time for the sync-noidle workload.

Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com> writes:

> On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 05:17:03PM -0400, Jeff Moyer wrote:

>> @@ -3678,11 +3710,14 @@ static void *cfq_init_queue(struct request_queue *q)
>>  
>>  	/* Init root service tree */
>>  	cfqd->grp_service_tree = CFQ_RB_ROOT;
>> +	cfqd->grp_service_tree.last_end_request = jiffies;
>>  
>
> This assignment is not required as we never update think time analsys of
> service tree where all the groups are hanging.  So for grp_service_tree,
> last_end_request can be zero and there will be no harm.

OK, thanks.

> Otherwise patch looks good to me. Can you please run some simple blkio
> cgroup tests to make sure that functionality is not broken.

Yes, I'll add that to my list and get back to you.

Thanks for the review, Vivek.

Cheers,
Jeff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/