[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100414.165851.144419620.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 16:58:51 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: dhowells@...hat.com
Cc: dvomlehn@...co.com, to@...mlehn-lnx2.corp.sa.net,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, maint_arch@...mlehn-lnx2.corp.sa.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/23] Make register values available to panic notifiers
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 00:52:14 +0100
> David VomLehn <dvomlehn@...co.com> wrote:
>
>> > Can the use of va_start() clobber lots of registers, thereby rendering the
>> > exercise pointless on some arches?
>> >
>>
>> The implementations I'm familiar with only need one or two registers. What
>> it *does* do is to force the contents of registers being used to pass
>> argument values onto the stack. This is roughly what gcc does for asm()
>> statements when you tell it registers are clobbered.
>
> How about something like Sparc, where you can pass up to 8 arguments (if I
> remember correctly) in registers. I'm not sure how Sparc handles varargs
> functions, though.
6 arguments, and all arguments get popped onto the stack into the
argument save area when doing varargs so you can access them as an
array.
Stack looks like:
struct register_window window;
unsigned long args[...];
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists