lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 12:38:39 +0800 From: Cong Wang <amwang@...hat.com> To: penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp CC: rolandd@...co.com, sean.hefty@...el.com, opurdila@...acom.com, eric.dumazet@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, nhorman@...driver.com, davem@...emloft.net, ebiederm@...ssion.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Infiniband: Randomize local port allocation. penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp wrote: > Sean Hefty wrote: >> Sean and Roland, is below patch correct? >>> inet_is_reserved_local_port() is the new function proposed in this patchset. >> It looks correct to me. I didn't test the patch series, but if I comment out >> the call to inet_is_reserved_local_port() in the provided below, the changes >> worked fine for me. >> >> Acked-by: Sean Hefty <sean.hefty@...el.com> >> > Thank you for testing. > > I think it is better to split this patch into > > Part 1: Make cma_alloc_any_port() to use cma_alloc_port(). > > Part 2: Insert "!inet_is_reserved_local_port(rover) &&" line. > > for future "git bisect". > Right, thanks a lot for your work! So, I will rebase my patch 3/3 on top of this patch. I hope someone could take this one asap. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists