[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4BC546CF.9020004@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 12:38:39 +0800
From: Cong Wang <amwang@...hat.com>
To: penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp
CC: rolandd@...co.com, sean.hefty@...el.com, opurdila@...acom.com,
eric.dumazet@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
nhorman@...driver.com, davem@...emloft.net, ebiederm@...ssion.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Infiniband: Randomize local port allocation.
penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp wrote:
> Sean Hefty wrote:
>> Sean and Roland, is below patch correct?
>>> inet_is_reserved_local_port() is the new function proposed in this patchset.
>> It looks correct to me. I didn't test the patch series, but if I comment out
>> the call to inet_is_reserved_local_port() in the provided below, the changes
>> worked fine for me.
>>
>> Acked-by: Sean Hefty <sean.hefty@...el.com>
>>
> Thank you for testing.
>
> I think it is better to split this patch into
>
> Part 1: Make cma_alloc_any_port() to use cma_alloc_port().
>
> Part 2: Insert "!inet_is_reserved_local_port(rover) &&" line.
>
> for future "git bisect".
>
Right, thanks a lot for your work!
So, I will rebase my patch 3/3 on top of this patch. I hope someone
could take this one asap.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists