[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4BC6B4B3.8070000@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 14:39:47 +0800
From: Miao Xie <miaox@...fujitsu.com>
To: Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>
CC: paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org, balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
lizf@...fujitsu.com, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: Lockdep splat in cpuset code acquiring alloc_lock
CC Oleg
CC Ingo
on 2010-4-15 5:10, Paul Menage wrote:
> Looks like select_fallback_rq() shouldn't be calling
> cpuset_cpus_allowed_locked(), which does a task_lock(), which isn't
> IRQ safe. Also, according to its comments that should only be held
> with the cpuset callback_mutex held, which seems unlikely from a
> softirq handler.
>
> Also, calling cpuset_cpus_allowed_locked(p, &p->cpus_allowed) stomps
> on state in p without (AFAICS) synchronization.
>
> The description of commit e76bd8d9850c2296a7e8e24c9dce9b5e6b55fe2f
> includes the phrase " I'm fairly sure this works, but there might be a
> deadlock hiding" although I think that the lockdep-reported problem is
> different than what Rusty had in mind.
This problem have been fixed by Oleg Nesterov, and the patchset was merged
into tip tree, but it's scheduled for .35 ...
http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/3/15/73
Thanks!
Miao
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists