[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1271240259.32749.17.camel@laptop>
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 12:17:39 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Raistlin <raistlin@...ux.it>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Chris Friesen <cfriesen@...tel.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Darren Hart <darren@...art.com>,
Henrik Austad <henrik@...tad.us>,
Johan Eker <johan.eker@...csson.com>,
"p.faure" <p.faure@...tech.ch>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Claudio Scordino <claudio@...dence.eu.com>,
michael trimarchi <trimarchi@...is.sssup.it>,
Fabio Checconi <fabio@...dalf.sssup.it>,
Tommaso Cucinotta <t.cucinotta@...up.it>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...il.com>,
Nicola Manica <nicola.manica@...il.com>,
Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@...tn.it>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/11] sched: SCHED_DEADLINE v2
Overall very nice code, awesome!
On Sun, 2010-02-28 at 20:06 +0100, Raistlin wrote:
> - migration of tasks throughout push and pull (as in -rt), to make it
> possible to deploy global-EDF scheduling. Patches are ready, they're
> just being tested and adapted to this last version;
Please post a version that includes this :-)
> - refinements in deadline inheritance, especially regarding the
> possibility of retaining bandwidth isolation among non-interacting
> tasks. This is being studied from both theoretical and practical
> points of view, and hopefully we can have some demonstrative code
> soon.
Right, I hope that with changing the PI code to use RB trees this will
become much less of a kludge than fudging the ->prio field.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists