linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/3] [idled]: Idle Cycle Injector for power capping

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1271317886.32749.69.camel@laptop>
Date:	Thu, 15 Apr 2010 09:51:26 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Salman <sqazi@...gle.com>
Cc:	mingo@...e.hu, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, svaidy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
	linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org, arjan@...radead.org,
	csadler@...gle.com, ranjitm@...gle.com, kenchen@...gle.com,
	dawnchen@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] [idled]: Idle Cycle Injector for power capping

On Tue, 2010-04-13 at 17:08 -0700, Salman wrote:
> As we discussed earlier this year, Google has an implementation that it
> would like to share.  I have finally gotten around to porting it to
> v2.6.33 and cleaning up the interfaces.  It is provided in the following
> messages for your review.  I realize that when we first discussed this
> idea, a lot of ideas were presented for enhancing it.  Thanks alot for
> your suggestions.  I haven't gotten around to implementing any of them.

.33 is way too old to submit patches against.

That said, I really really dislike this approach, I would much rather
see it tie in with power aware scheduling.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/