[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100415171142.D192.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 17:17:33 +0900 (JST)
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
To: Suleiman Souhlal <ssouhlal@...ebsd.org>
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com, Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>,
Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, suleiman@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] vmscan: delegate pageout io to flusher thread if current is kswapd
>
> On Apr 14, 2010, at 9:11 PM, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
>
> > Now, vmscan pageout() is one of IO throuput degression source.
> > Some IO workload makes very much order-0 allocation and reclaim
> > and pageout's 4K IOs are making annoying lots seeks.
> >
> > At least, kswapd can avoid such pageout() because kswapd don't
> > need to consider OOM-Killer situation. that's no risk.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
>
> What's your opinion on trying to cluster the writes done by pageout,
> instead of not doing any paging out in kswapd?
> Something along these lines:
Interesting.
So, I'd like to review your patch carefully. can you please give me one
day? :)
>
> Cluster writes to disk due to memory pressure.
>
> Write out logically adjacent pages to the one we're paging out
> so that we may get better IOs in these situations:
> These pages are likely to be contiguous on disk to the one we're
> writing out, so they should get merged into a single disk IO.
>
> Signed-off-by: Suleiman Souhlal <suleiman@...gle.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists