linux-kernel - Re: hdlc_ppp: why no detach()?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <m3tyrdmvkc.fsf@intrepid.localdomain>
Date:	Thu, 15 Apr 2010 02:02:59 +0200
From:	Krzysztof Halasa <khc@...waw.pl>
To:	Michael Barkowski <michaelbarkowski@...gedcom.com>
Cc:	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>,
	"netdev\@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: hdlc_ppp: why no detach()?

> 1. The SCR packet will be delayed by 2 seconds (both first and second
>    SCR will be sent the same time). Perhaps we delay only a little
>    (instead of full 2 seconds) and only then send the initial packet.

BTW can I sleep in a netdevice_notifier callback, no?
-- 
Krzysztof Halasa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/