[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100415195227.D1B0.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 20:26:08 +0900 (JST)
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
To: Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com, Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] vmscan: delegate pageout io to flusher thread if current is kswapd
> On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 01:11:37PM +0900, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> > Now, vmscan pageout() is one of IO throuput degression source.
> > Some IO workload makes very much order-0 allocation and reclaim
> > and pageout's 4K IOs are making annoying lots seeks.
> >
> > At least, kswapd can avoid such pageout() because kswapd don't
> > need to consider OOM-Killer situation. that's no risk.
> >
>
> Well, there is some risk here. Direct reclaimers may not be cleaning
> more pages than it had to previously except it splices subsystems
> together increasing stack usage and causing further problems.
>
> It might not cause OOM-killer issues but it could increase the time
> dirty pages spend on the LRU.
>
> Am I missing something?
No. you are right. I fully agree your previous mail. so, I need to cool down a bit ;)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists