[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4BC6FBC8.9090204@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 20:43:04 +0900
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>
CC: Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Bob Liu <lliubbo@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] change alloc function in pcpu_alloc_pages
Hello,
On 04/15/2010 07:21 PM, Minchan Kim wrote:
> kill alloc_pages_exact_node?
> Sorry but I can't understand your point.
> I don't want to kill user of alloc_pages_exact_node.
> That's opposite.
> I want to kill user of alloc_pages_node and change it with
> alloc_pages_any_node or alloc_pages_exact_node. :)
I see, so...
alloc_pages() -> alloc_pages_any_node()
alloc_pages_node() -> alloc_pages_exact_node()
right? It just seems strange to me and different from usual naming
convention - ie. something which doesn't care about nodes usually
doesn't carry _node postfix. Anyways, no big deal, those names just
felt a bit strange to me.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists