[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100415133431.GD3561@quack.suse.cz>
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 15:34:31 +0200
From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc: Anton Blanchard <anton@...ba.org>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix regression in O_DIRECT|O_SYNC writes to block
devices
On Thu 15-04-10 12:42:24, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 02:40:39PM +1000, Anton Blanchard wrote:
> > int blkdev_fsync(struct file *filp, struct dentry *dentry, int datasync)
> > {
> > - struct block_device *bdev = I_BDEV(filp->f_mapping->host);
> > + struct inode *bd_inode = filp->f_mapping->host;
> > + struct block_device *bdev = I_BDEV(bd_inode);
> > int error;
> >
> > + mutex_unlock(&bd_inode->i_mutex);
> > +
> > error = sync_blockdev(bdev);
>
> Actually you can just drop this call entirely. sync_blockdev is an
> overcomplicated alias for filemap_write_and_wait on the block device
> inode, which is exactl what we did just before calling into ->fsync
>
> It might be worth to still drop i_mutex for the cache flush, though.
Yeah, that's a good point... Anton, just remove sync_blockdev() from
blkdev_fsync completely please.
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists