[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1271343970.3856.7.camel@iscandar.digidescorp.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 10:06:10 -0500
From: "Steven J. Magnani" <steve@...idescorp.com>
To: michal.simek@...alogix.com
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Wu Zhangjin <wuzhangjin@...il.com>
Subject: Re: sched_clock - microblaze
Michal,
On Thu, 2010-04-15 at 16:55 +0200, Michal Simek wrote:
> Is unimplemented sched_clock the reason why ftrace not show fine grain time?
>
> Or is there any other thing which is wrong?
>
I think that's it. On my platform we have a free-running 1 MHz counter
so I implemented a platform sched_clock for that, and I get nice ftrace
times.
0) + 65.000 us | finish_task_switch();
0) | lock_sock_nested() {
0) + 52.000 us | local_bh_disable();
0) + 53.000 us | local_bh_enable();
0) ! 264.000 us | }
Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists