[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100415175446.GA32413@amt.cnet>
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 14:54:46 -0300
From: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>
To: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>, KVM list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] KVM MMU: fix kvm_mmu_zap_page() and its calling
path
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 09:25:03PM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
> - calculate zapped page number properly in mmu_zap_unsync_children()
> - calculate freeed page number properly kvm_mmu_change_mmu_pages()
>
> Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@...fujitsu.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c | 12 ++++++++----
> 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
> index a23ca75..41cccd4 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
> @@ -1481,13 +1481,16 @@ static int mmu_zap_unsync_children(struct kvm *kvm,
> struct kvm_mmu_page *sp;
>
> for_each_sp(pages, sp, parents, i) {
> + if (list_empty(&kvm->arch.active_mmu_pages))
> + goto exit;
I meant to check for list_empty in kvm_mmu_change_mmu_pages, instead of
relying on the count returned by kvm_mmu_zap_page. Similarly to what
__kvm_mmu_free_some_pages does.
Checking here is not needed because the pages returned in the array
will not be zapped (mmu_lock is held).
Applied 1, 4 and 5 (so please regenerate against kvm.git -next branch),
thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists