[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100415210357.GG5069@nowhere>
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 23:03:59 +0200
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To: Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@...onical.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] Stop tracing on a schedule bug
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 12:20:16PM -0400, Chase Douglas wrote:
> This change adds a tracing_off_event() call to stop tracing on schedule
> bugs unless tracing_off=none was specified on the commandline.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@...onical.com>
> ---
> kernel/sched.c | 2 ++
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
> index 6af210a..439f036 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched.c
> @@ -3590,6 +3590,8 @@ static noinline void __schedule_bug(struct task_struct *prev)
> {
> struct pt_regs *regs = get_irq_regs();
>
> + tracing_off_event(TRACE_EVENT_BUG);
> +
> printk(KERN_ERR "BUG: scheduling while atomic: %s/%d/0x%08x\n",
> prev->comm, prev->pid, preempt_count());
I would rather call that a TRACE_EVENT_WARN as this is what happens: we
warn but we continue.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists