[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100416134336.GA2615@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 06:43:36 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Hugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@...cali.co.uk>,
Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>, Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/13] powerpc: Add rcu_read_lock() to gup_fast()
implementation
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 04:54:51PM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-04-15 at 07:28 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> >
> > Of course, with call_rcu_sched(), the corresponding RCU read-side
> > critical
> > sections are non-preemptible. Therefore, in CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT, these
> > read-side critical sections must use raw spinlocks.
> >
> > Can the code in question accommodate these restrictions?
>
> What we protect against is always code that hard-disable IRQs (though
> there seem to be a bug in the hugepages code there...). Would that
> work ?
>From the perspective of call_rcu_sched() and synchronize_sched(),
the following things mark RCU-sched read-side critical sections:
1. rcu_read_lock_sched() and rcu_read_unlock_sched().
2. preempt_disable() and preempt_enable(), along with anything
else that disables preemption.
3. local_bh_disable() and local_bh_enable(), along with anything
else that disables bottom halves.
4. local_irq_disable() and local_irq_enable(), along wiht anything
else that disables hardirqs.
5. Handlers for NMIs.
So I believe that in this case call_rcu_sched() is your friend. ;-)
Thanx, Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists