linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] [watchdog] combine nmi

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20100416144616.GC5162@nowhere>
Date:	Fri, 16 Apr 2010 16:46:17 +0200
From:	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To:	Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
Cc:	Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>, mingo@...e.hu,
	peterz@...radead.org, aris@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] [watchdog] combine nmi_watchdog and softlockup

On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 06:32:32PM +0400, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 03:47:14AM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> [...]
> > > +
> > > +/* Callback function for perf event subsystem */
> > > +void watchdog_overflow_callback(struct perf_event *event, int nmi,
> > > +		 struct perf_sample_data *data,
> > > +		 struct pt_regs *regs)
> > > +{
> > > +	int this_cpu = smp_processor_id();
> > > +	unsigned long touch_ts = per_cpu(watchdog_touch_ts, this_cpu);
> > > +
> > > +	if (touch_ts == 0) {
> > > +		__touch_watchdog();
> > > +		return;
> > > +	}
> > > +
> > > +	/* check for a hardlockup
> > > +	 * This is done by making sure our timer interrupt
> > > +	 * is incrementing.  The timer interrupt should have
> > > +	 * fired multiple times before we overflow'd.  If it hasn't
> > > +	 * then this is a good indication the cpu is stuck
> > > +	 */
> > > +	if (is_hardlockup(this_cpu)) {
> > > +		/* only print hardlockups once */
> > > +		if (cpumask_test_cpu(this_cpu, to_cpumask(hardlockup_mask)))
> > > +			return;
> > > +
> > > +		if (hardlockup_panic)
> > > +			panic("Watchdog detected hard LOCKUP on cpu %d", this_cpu);
> > > +		else
> > > +			WARN(1, "Watchdog detected hard LOCKUP on cpu %d", this_cpu);
> > > +
> > > +		cpumask_set_cpu(this_cpu, to_cpumask(hardlockup_mask));
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > May be have an arch spin lock there to update your cpu mask safely.
> > 
> 
> Hmm, this is NMI handler path so from what we protect this per-cpu data?
> Do I miss something? /me confused


The cpu mask is not per cpu here, this is a shared bitmap, so you
can race against other cpus NMIs.

That said, as I suggested, having a per cpu var that we set when we
warned would be much better than a spinlock here.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/