[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100416145023.GI19264@csn.ul.ie>
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 15:50:24 +0100
From: Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>
To: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>,
Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/10] Reduce stack usage used by page reclaim V1
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 06:21:33PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> This is just an RFC to reduce some of the more obvious stack usage in page
> reclaim. It's a bit rushed and I haven't tested this yet but am sending
> it out as there may be others working on similar material and would rather
> avoid overlap. I built on some of Kosaki Motohiro's work.
>
So the first pass seems to have been reasonably well received. Kosaki,
Rik and Johannes, how you do typically test reclaim-related patches for
regressions? My initial sniff-tests look ok with the page leak sorted out
but I typically am not searching for vmscan regressions other than lumpy
reclaim.
> On X86 bit, stack usage figures (generated using a modified bloat-o-meter
This should have been X86-64. The stack shrinkage is less on X86
obviously because of the difference size of pointers and the like.
> that uses checkstack.pl as its input) change in the following ways after
> the series of patches.
>
> add/remove: 2/0 grow/shrink: 0/4 up/down: 804/-1688 (-884)
> function old new delta
> putback_lru_pages - 676 +676
> update_isolated_counts - 128 +128
> do_try_to_free_pages 172 128 -44
> kswapd 1324 1168 -156
> shrink_page_list 1616 1224 -392
> shrink_zone 2320 1224 -1096
>
> There are some growths there but critically they are no longer in the path
> that would call writepages. In the main path, there is about 1K of stack
> lopped off giving a small amount of breathing room.
>
> KOSAKI Motohiro (3):
> vmscan: kill prev_priority completely
> vmscan: move priority variable into scan_control
> vmscan: simplify shrink_inactive_list()
>
> Mel Gorman (7):
> vmscan: Remove useless loop at end of do_try_to_free_pages
> vmscan: Remove unnecessary temporary vars in do_try_to_free_pages
> vmscan: Split shrink_zone to reduce stack usage
> vmscan: Remove unnecessary temporary variables in shrink_zone()
> vmscan: Setup pagevec as late as possible in shrink_inactive_list()
> vmscan: Setup pagevec as late as possible in shrink_page_list()
> vmscan: Update isolated page counters outside of main path in
> shrink_inactive_list()
>
> include/linux/mmzone.h | 15 --
> mm/page_alloc.c | 2 -
> mm/vmscan.c | 447 +++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
> mm/vmstat.c | 2 -
> 4 files changed, 210 insertions(+), 256 deletions(-)
>
--
Mel Gorman
Part-time Phd Student Linux Technology Center
University of Limerick IBM Dublin Software Lab
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists