[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1271432019.2075.31.camel@localhost>
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 16:33:39 +0100
From: Richard Kennedy <richard@....demon.co.uk>
To: Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
Subject: [PATCH] fs-writeback : check sync bit earlier in
inode_wait_for_writeback
When wb_writeback() hasn't written anything it will re-acquire the inode
lock before calling inode_wait_for_writeback.
This change tests the sync bit first so that is doesn't need to drop &
re-acquire the lock if the inode became available while wb_writeback()
was waiting to get the lock.
Signed-off-by: Richard Kennedy <richard@....demon.co.uk>
----
patch against 2.6.34-rc4
compiled & tested on 86_64
regards
Richard
diff --git a/fs/fs-writeback.c b/fs/fs-writeback.c
index 4b37f7c..b1e398e 100644
--- a/fs/fs-writeback.c
+++ b/fs/fs-writeback.c
@@ -398,11 +398,11 @@ static void inode_wait_for_writeback(struct inode *inode)
wait_queue_head_t *wqh;
wqh = bit_waitqueue(&inode->i_state, __I_SYNC);
- do {
+ while (inode->i_state & I_SYNC) {
spin_unlock(&inode_lock);
__wait_on_bit(wqh, &wq, inode_wait, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
spin_lock(&inode_lock);
- } while (inode->i_state & I_SYNC);
+ }
}
/*
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists