[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100416131823.c874125a.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 13:18:23 +0900
From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: disallow direct reclaim page writeback
On Fri, 16 Apr 2010 10:13:39 +0900
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
> Hmm. Then, if memoy cgroup is filled by dirty pages, it can't kick writeback
> and has to wait for someone else's writeback ?
>
> How long this will take ?
> # mount -t cgroup none /cgroup -o memory
> # mkdir /cgroup/A
> # echo 20M > /cgroup/A/memory.limit_in_bytes
> # echo $$ > /cgroup/A/tasks
> # dd if=/dev/zero of=./tmpfile bs=4096 count=1000000
>
> Can memcg ask writeback thread to "Wake Up Now! and Write this out!" effectively ?
>
Hmm.. I saw an oom-kill while testing several cases but performance itself
seems not to be far different with or without patch.
But I'm unhappy with oom-kill, so some tweak for memcg will be necessary
if we'll go with this.
Thanks,
-Kame
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists